A&A 457, 35-43 (2006)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065455
Optical spectroscopy of BL Lacertae objects
Broad lines, companion galaxies, and redshift lower limits
B. Sbarufatti1 -
R. Falomo2 -
A. Treves1 -
J. Kotilainen3
1 - Università dell'Insubria, via Valleggio 11, 22100 Como, Italy
2 -
INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio
5, 35122 Padova, Italy
3 -
Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku, Väisäläntie 20, 21500
Piikkiö, Finland
Received 19 April 2006 / Accepted 11 May 2006
Abstract
Aims. We present optical spectroscopy for a sample of BL Lac objects, to determine their redshift, to study their broad emission line properties, and to characterize their close environment.
Methods. Twelve objects were observed using the ESO 3.6 m and NOT 2.5 m telescopes, obtaining spectra for the BL Lacs and for nearby sources.
Results. For seven of these objects, nuclear emission lines and/or absorption lines from the host galaxy were detected. In all the four cases where absorption lines were revealed, the host galaxy has been resolved with HST or ground-based imaging. The broad H
luminosities (or their upper limits) of the BL Lacs are similar to those of radio-loud quasars. For two BL Lacs, spectroscopy of close companions indicates that they are at the redshift of the BL Lacs, and therefore physically associated and probably interacting. Five BL Lacs have a featureless spectrum. In these cases, we apply a new technique to derive lower limits for their redshift, which are consistent with the lower limits deduced from imaging.
Key words: BL Lacertae objects: general
The BL Lacertae objects (hereafter BL Lacs) are a relatively rare
subclass of active galactic nuclei (AGN) characterized by luminous,
rapidly variable UV-to-NIR non-thermal continuum emission and polarization,
strong compact flat-spectrum radio emission, and superluminal motion.
Similar properties are also observed in flat-spectrum radio, quasars
and these two types of AGN are often grouped together into
the class of blazars. The continuum emission of BL Lacs is boosted by
relativistic beaming, which depresses the equivalent width (EW)
of the spectral lines.
Apart from possible fluorescent emission lines
as in other types of AGN, however absorption lines from
the stellar population of the host galaxy, from intervening material and from
the halo of the Milky Way are expected to be present in BL Lacs.
These lines are probes of the physical conditions in the source
and in the intervening medium. They are obviously the most direct way of
determining or constraining the redshift of the source.
The detection of weak lines requires high S/N spectroscopy that,
for most BL Lacs, translates into a necessity to use large telescopes.
Until recently, most of the work in this field has made use of 2-4 m
class telescopes
(e.g. Véron-Cetty & Véron 1993; Falomo et al. 1994; Rector & Stocke 2001; Landt et al. 2001; Hook et al. 2003; Carangelo et al. 2003; Drinkwater et al. 1997; Marchã et al. 1996; Bade et al. 1994; Stickel & Kühr 1993; Londish et al. 2002; Laurent-Muehleisen et al. 1998; Falomo et al. 1993; Falomo 1996).
However, significantly better results have been obtained with 8 m
class telescopes (e.g. Heidt et al. 2004; Sowards-Emmerd et al. 2005; Woo et al. 2005).
In particular, a substantial step forward in the detection of
faint spectral lines was achieved by our extensive study of 42 BL Lacs
performed with the ESO VLT (Sbarufatti et al. 2006,2005a, hereafter S05a and S06),
where we determined the redshift for 18 sources and developed a technique
for obtaining redshift lower limits for lineless sources.
In this paper, we complement the ESO-VLT dataset by observations with 2-4 m
class telescopes of sources that were not observed with the VLT or that were
observed in a different spectral range. The sample of 12 objects was taken
from the list of BL Lacs in Padovani & Giommi (1995) by
selecting the brightest targets
among those with no available redshift, along with bright, nearby targets to
search for broad emission lines (in particular H
), and/or to study
their environment.
The first results of this campaign concerning new redshifts
were published by Carangelo et al. (2003). Here we discuss the featureless objects,
the search for broad lines, and the properties of companions of the BL Lacs.
For the five lineless objects, we apply a technique, developed in S06,
that allows us to set lower limits to the redshift.
For the four low redshift objects, we report a measurement or an upper limit
for the broad component of the H
emission line.
We also present and discuss the spectra of the close companions of
1H 0323+022 and 1ES 1440+122.
The following cosmological parameters are adopted throughout this paper:
H0= 70 km s-1 Mpc-1,
,
.
Table 1:
Journal of observations.
In Table 1 we report a journal of the observations and in
Table 2 the instrumental configurations.
The low-resolution setups (A, B, N) were used for determinating redshifts
and for studying sources in the close environment of the BL Lacs,
while the medium resolution setup (C) was used to search for
the broad components of emission lines, especially H
.
Table 2:
Instrumental configurations.
Data reduction was performed using IRAF
(Tody 1993,1986), following the standard procedures
for spectral analysis. This includes bias subtraction, flat fielding, and
removal of bad pixels. For each target, we obtained two spectra in order to
get a good correction of the cosmic rays and to check for the reality of
weak spectral features. The individual frames were then combined into
a single average image.
Wavelength calibration was performed using the spectra of
a helium/neon/argon lamp obtained during the same observing night,
resulting in an accuracy of
3 Å (rms).
From these calibrated final images, we extracted the one-dimensional spectra
adopting an optimal extraction algorithm (Horne 1986) to improve the S/N.
Although this program did not require optimal photometric conditions,
the sky was clear during most of the observations. This enables us to perform
a spectrophotometric calibration of the data using standard stars
(Oke 1990) observed during the same nights.
The ESO spectral setups B and C at wavelengths
Å
are affected by fringing. This was corrected for using flat field images
taken immediately before or after the spectrum of the object,
with the telescope in the same position.
In the cases where such flat field images were not available,
the resulting fringing pattern makes the detection of features
in this spectral range very difficult, if not impossible.
Finally, all the spectra were dereddened following the extinction law by
Cardelli et al. (1989) and assuming the EB-V values computed by
Schlegel et al. (1998).
![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=13cm,clip]{5455fig1a} \end{figure}](/articles/aa/full/2006/37/aa5455-06/Timg7.gif) |
Figure 1:
Spectra of the BL Lacs observed with the ESO 3.6 m and
the NOT 2.5 m telescopes. Top panel: flux calibrated spectra. Bottom panel:
spectra normalized with respect to the continuum.
Telluric bands are indicated by ,
spectral lines are marked by the
line ID, and absorption features from atomic species in
the interstellar medium of our galaxy are labeled by ISM. |
| Open with DEXTER |
![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=12cm,clip]{5455fig2.eps}\end{figure}](/articles/aa/full/2006/37/aa5455-06/Timg11.gif) |
Figure 2:
The environment of 1H 0323+22. In the main panel
(ESO 3.6 m raw image, 10 s exposure), the
companion galaxy G1 is labeled. The subpanel in the lower right hand corner
(R-band image, adapted from Falomo 1996) shows a
higher resolution image of the BL Lac. The nucleus surrounded
by the host galaxy is apparent, together with the compact knot G2. The
angular separation between the nucleus and G2 is 2.6''. |
| Open with DEXTER |
In Fig. 1, we present the optical spectrum of each source.
In order to show the continuum shape and the faint features more clearly,
we report both the flux-calibrated and the normalized spectrum
for each object. The main emission and absorption features are identified,
while interstellar absorption features are marked as ISM and telluric
absorption features as
.
All these spectra are electronically available in our spectroscopic library of
BL Lacs, at http://www.oapd.inaf.it/zbllac/.
The spectra appear featureless for five objects. In these cases,
using the minimum observable EW (EW
), it is possible to derive
a lower limit for the redshift.
This procedure is described in detail in S06. Briefly, it is based on
the assumption that the host galaxy is an elliptical
with an absolute magnitude of
,
as derived from
the analysis of a homogeneous sample of HST images of BL Lacs
(see Urry et al. 2000; Sbarufatti et al. 2005b, hereafter S05b).
By adopting a template for the spectrum of an elliptical galaxy (Kinney et al. 1996),
it was shown by S06 that from the apparent magnitude of the BL Lac,
and the EW
in the spectrum, one can obtain a lower limit to the redshift.
The lower limits from this procedure and their comparison with redshifts
or lower limits deduced from the imaging of the host galaxy are reported in
Table 3.
Table 3:
Featureless objects.
this radio source was discovered in
the 5 GHz Green Bank survey (Davis 1971) and subsequently classified as
a BL Lac by Owen & Muffson (1977).
It exhibits significant variability in flux and polarization in both radio and
optical bands (Ciprini et al. 2004).
The host galaxy was not detected in images obtained at
the NTT (Falomo 1996) and the NOT (Nilsson et al. 2003).
The claimed detection of the host by Wright et al. (1998) (mK=12.2) is dubious,
since the host is resolved only in one of their two images.
Based on the non-detection of the host and assuming that the host has
an absolute magnitude MR=-23.5, Falomo (1996) proposed a lower limit to
its redshift of z>0.4.
Previous low-medium S/N optical spectra were featureless
(Wills & Wills 1979; Falomo et al. 1994). Although we reach a high S/N (
)
in the red
(5500-9000 Å), the spectrum remains featureless (Fig. 1).
We determine EW
= 0.43 Å, which implies a redshift lower limit of z>0.18according to our adopted procedure, consistent with, but considerably
lower than, the limit from imaging.
this X-ray selected object (Doxsey et al. 1983)
was classified as a BL Lac by Margon & Jacoby (1984). It exhibits significant
optical polarization (Feigelson et al. 1986) and variability (Villata et al. 2000).
The host galaxy was resolved in ground-based images by Feigelson et al. (1986),
Falomo (1996), and Nilsson et al. (2003).
The signature of the host galaxy at z=0.147 was also clearly apparent in
the optical spectrum of Filippenko et al. (1986).
Despite being dominated by the strong nuclear component, our new spectrum
(Fig. 1), clearly shows several absorption lines from
the host galaxy, i.e. CaII
3934,3968 and G band
4305
(setup A), and NaI
5892 (setup C),
confirming its redshift as z=0.147.
The spectrum also reveals the narrow [NII]
6583 emission line at
this redshift. However, no broad H
emission is detected,
with an EW
limit of 1 Å, corresponding to an upper limit of
erg s-1 for the broad H
luminosity.
This BL Lac is located in a complex environment (e.g. Falomo 1996),
as shown in Fig. 2. At a distance of
1' east of
the BL Lac, there is a bright elliptical galaxy (G1) at a similar redshift to
the BL Lac (
,
Falomo 1996).
In the close environment of the BL Lac, there are a number of complex
emission features (Fig. 2). In particular,
a compact knot-like structure (G2) is located at a distance of
2.6''.
We observed 1H 0323+022 using the setup A, with the slit slightly
shifted with respect to the nucleus, to also simultaneously obtain the spectra
of G1 and G2 (Fig. 3).
G1 is a bright elliptical galaxy at a redshift of z=0.160, determined from
the CaII H & K, G band, and MgI absorption lines.
Because of its small angular distance from the BL Lac and its low surface
brightness, the spectrum of G2 (Fig. 3, second panel)
is contaminated by the light from the BL Lac and its host galaxy. Therefore we
extracted a spectrum using
an identical aperture size to the one used for G2, taken in a position
symmetric to G2 with respect to the position of the BL Lac
(Fig. 3, third panel), and subtracted it
from the spectrum of G2.
The decontaminated spectrum of G2 (Fig. 3, bottom panel)
has the characteristic shape of an elliptical galaxy,
with the absorption features of CaII
3934,3968, G band
4305, and MgI
5175 at z=0.148.
The measured flux from the spectrum leads to an estimate of
,
which corresponds to MR=-20.9. Therefore, G2 could be an elliptical
dwarf galaxy at the redshift of 1H 0323+022,
as already suggested by Falomo (1996). The projected distance of G2 from
the BL Lac is only
kpc.
this is a well studied BL Lac that has been
observed extensively at all wavelengths
(see e.g. Pian et al. 1996, and references therein).
The host galaxy has been resolved in several imaging studies
(e.g. Cheung et al. 2003; Wurtz et al. 1996; Falomo et al. 1994; Urry et al. 2000; Kotilainen et al. 1998).
The redshift of this BL Lac (z=0.055) Danziger et al. (1979) is based on
both absorption lines from the host galaxy and strong emission lines from
the nucleus. In particular, a broad (
km s-1) H
with varying EW (ranging from 20 to 80 Å) has been detected
(Falomo et al. 1994).
Our high S/N spectrum (Fig. 1)
clearly shows the narrow [OII]
6300,
HeI
5875, and SII
6716,6730 emission lines,
and the broad H
+[NII] blend, with
Å, corresponding to
a broad H
luminosity of
erg s-1,
which is within the range previously observed by Falomo et al. (1994).
![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{5455fig3.eps}\end{figure}](/articles/aa/full/2006/37/aa5455-06/Timg26.gif) |
Figure 3:
Spectra of the companion objects of 1H 0323+22.
Top panel: G1; second panel: G2 (before decontamination);
third panel: spectrum of the BL Lac, taken with an aperture symmetric to G2;
bottom panel: G2 (decontaminated spectrum). |
| Open with DEXTER |
this X-ray selected BL Lac at z=0.068
(Fosbury & Disney 1976) is located in a rich environment (Falomo et al. 1995).
At least one of the companions shows signs of interaction with the BL Lac.
The host galaxy has been detected both in imaging (Urry et al. 2000)
and in spectroscopy by Falomo & Ulrich (2000), who did not reveal emission lines.
Our new spectrum (Fig. 1) clearly shows
a narrow emission line, which we identify as [NII]
6583 at z=0.068.
The presence of [NII] emission could be a signature of recent star formation
in the host galaxy, induced by the interaction with the close companion
Falomo et al. (1995). No other emission features are detected,
and the EW
limit of 0.9 Å corresponds to an upper limit of
erg s-1 for the broad H
luminosity, i.e. five times
smaller than the upper limit by Falomo & Ulrich (2000).
this is an X-ray selected BL Lac belonging
to the EINSTEIN Extended Medium Sensitivity Survey (EMSS, Gioia et al. 1990).
Previous low S/N spectroscopy (Stocke et al. 1985) showed a featureless continuum.
The HST imaging of this BL Lac (Scarpa et al. 2000a) failed to resolve
the host galaxy, suggesting a redshift lower limit z>0.4 (see S05b).
Our new spectrum (Fig. 1) is featureless
with EW
= 1.48 Å, which gives a spectroscopic redshift lower limit of
z>0.49, very consistent with the lower limit from imaging.
this BL Lac belongs to
the EMSS.
The host galaxy has been resolved both in ground-based (Falomo & Kotilainen 1999)
and in HST imaging (Urry et al. 2000), indicating a redshift lower limit
of
.
Earlier spectroscopy of this BL Lac by Perlman et al. (1996)
showed a featureless spectrum. From our moderate S/N spectrum
(Fig. 1), we determine EW
= 2.50 Å, which implies
a redshift lower limit of z>0.29, consistent with the limit obtained
from imaging.
this high-energy peaked BL Lac (HBL)
has been proposed as a candidate TeV source by Stecker et al. (1996),
being supposedly at a relatively low redshift
(z=0.150, Perlman et al. 1996). However, this redshift estimate,
based on the possible detection of absorption features from the host galaxy,
is ruled out by our new spectrum (Fig. 1), from which
the measured EW
= 0.75 Å implies z>0.60.
Moreover, the non-detection of the host galaxy in imaging sets
a further lower limit of z>0.92 (S05b), considerably higher than
the spectroscopic one, making the detection of this BL Lac
in the TeV domain unlikely. Indeed Horan et al. (2004) failed to detect
this BL Lac using the Whipple 10 m
-ray telescope.
this HBL belongs to the Sedentary Survey
(Giommi et al. 2005). Its host galaxy was resolved with HST imaging,
giving an imaging redshift of
(S05b).
Previous optical spectroscopy (White et al. 2000; Laurent-Muehleisen et al. 1998; Scarpa et al. 1995) has shown
a featureless spectrum. Note that the redshift z=0.34 reported for this
BL Lac by the NASA Extragalactic Database is based on a very low S/N (
5) Sloan Digital Sky Survey
spectrum
. This redshift is ruled out by our new, much higher S/N
(
)
spectrum (Fig. 1),
which shows a featureless continuum. From the EW
value
(EW
= 0.8 Å), we deduce a redshift lower limit of z>0.24,
consistent with the imaging redshift estimate.
![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=12cm,clip]{5455fig4.eps}\end{figure}](/articles/aa/full/2006/37/aa5455-06/Timg32.gif) |
Figure 4:
The environment of 1ES 1440+122. In the main panel
(R-band image taken at the NOT by R. Falomo), the locations of
galaxies G1 and G2 and the nucleus (A+B) are indicated.
Subpanel: HST detail of the region around the BL Lac
(filter F702W image from Scarpa et al. 1999);
A is the BL Lac nucleus, B is a foreground star (see Giovannini et al. 2004).
The angular separation between A and G2 is 2''. North and East directions are indicated by the arrow. |
| Open with DEXTER |
this is an X-ray selected BL Lac belonging
to the Einstein Slew Survey. It is located in a rich environment
(Fig. 4),
being surrounded by
20 galaxies (Heidt et al. 1999), thus suggesting
that this BL Lac is located in a group or a small cluster of galaxies.
The host galaxy has been resolved in several imaging studies
(Heidt et al. 1999; Urry et al. 2000; Falomo & Kotilainen 1999; Kotilainen & Falomo 2004).
High-resolution HST imaging by Scarpa et al. (1999) revealed
a very close companion (
0.3'') to this BL Lac,
suggesting the possibility of gravitational lensing.
This hypothesis was, however, ruled out by a radio-optical study by
Giovannini et al. (2004), who demonstrated that the companion object is
a foreground star.
We obtained spectra of the BL Lac itself (Fig. 1),
of a galaxy at a distance of 25'' (G1), and of a close companion
at a distance of
2'' (G2; Fig. 5).
The spectrum of 1ES1440+122 is dominated by emission from
the host galaxy, but the contribution of the nucleus becomes apparent
towards blue wavelengths
(indeed, the strength of the CaII break is only
20%).
The redshift of this BL Lac, z=0.162,
measured from the CaII
3934,3968, G band
4305, and
MgI
5175 absorption lines from the host galaxy
confirms the result by Schachter et al. (1993).
G1 is a typical elliptical galaxy at a redshift of z=0.164
and at a projected distance from the BL Lac of
98 kpc. The other
companion, G2, is also an elliptical galaxy at a redshift of z=0.161
(see also Nilsson et al. 2003, who discuss their unpublished spectrum of G2),
and at a projected distance from the BL Lac of only
8 kpc.
Such a small separation strongly indicates that the BL Lac and the galaxy G2
are interacting.
this X-ray selected BL Lac is at
low redshift
emission lines]falomo87. More recent spectroscopy has revealed
weak NI
1135 and CIII
1176 emission lines from the nucleus
(Penton et al. 2004) and absorption lines from the host galaxy (Pesce et al. 1994).
The host galaxy of this BL Lac, resolved in several optical and NIR
imaging studies (Cheung et al. 2003; Stickel & Kühr 1993; Urry et al. 2000; Kotilainen et al. 1998; Falomo 1996),
is a giant elliptical with MR=-23.1
in a relatively rich environment (Pesce et al. 1994). Several of the nearby
galaxies are known to be at the redshift of the BL Lac
(Stickel & Kühr 1993; Pesce et al. 1994). The optical spectrum of this BL Lac is
strongly dominated by the nuclear continuum
(Falomo et al. 1994; Perlman et al. 1996). The very high S/N reached by our new spectrum
(
400, setup A; Fig. 1) allowed the detection of
the spectroscopic signatures from the host galaxy.
The CaII
3934,3968, G band
4305 and
MgI
5175 absorption lines have EW ranging from 0.2 to 0.4 Å.
The spectrum obtained with setup C confirms the presence of H
6563 and [NII]
6583 narrow emission lines.
No broad component of H
is detected, with an EW
limit of 0.2 Å,
corresponding to an upper limit of
erg s-1
for the broad H
luminosity. For recent spectroscopic results on the host galaxy, see Bressan et al. (2006).
although this HBL, a prototype of
its class, has been studied in a large number of papers at all wavelengths
(e.g. Pesce et al. 1997, and references therein), little optical spectroscopy
has been published. Its redshift, z=0.116, has been measured by
Falomo et al. (1993), from the G band and the MgI and NaI absorption lines
(and a marginally detected CaII doublet) in a spectrum of the host galaxy with
the slit offset from the nucleus.
The host galaxy has been resolved in imaging studies,
with I=14.8 (Kotilainen et al. 1998; Falomo et al. 1991), consistent with this redshift.
Our new high S/N ESO spectrum (Fig. 1),
also taken with the slit offset from the nucleus, allows us to confirm
detection of all the features reported by Falomo et al. (1993). In particular,
the CaII lines
3934,3968 are clearly revealed,
with EW of 0.5 and 0.4 Å for the K and H lines, respectively.
this radio source was classified as a BL Lac
by Weiler & Johnston (1980). Its redshift, z=0.026, proposed by Wills & Wills (1976)
has been confirmed by more recent observations, showing absorption lines from
the host galaxy, along with narrow and broad nuclear emission lines,
in particular, broad components of H
and H
(Véron-Cetty & Véron 1993; Falomo et al. 1987).
Our new spectrum (Fig. 1) reveals the [OII]
6300,
[NII]
6583, H
6563 and SII
6730
emission lines. The H
-[NII] blend clearly shows the presence of
a broad component, with an EW of 13.8 Å, corresponding to
a broad H
luminosity of
erg s-1.
We have presented new, high quality optical spectroscopy of a sample of
12 BL Lac objects. Absorption lines from the host galaxy were detected
in four objects. In all these cases, the host galaxy was also resolved
in imaging, either with HST (1ES 1440+122, Urry et al. 2000)
or from the ground (1H 0323+022, PKS 2005-489,
PKS 2155-304, see Feigelson et al. 1986; Pesce et al. 1994; Kotilainen et al. 1998, respectively).
The absolute magnitude of the host is close to
MR= -22.9 in all cases,
which is typical of BL Lac hosts (S05b). The characterization of
the absorption lines from the host galaxy is, however, arduous in most cases,
because the EW of the lines is strongly reduced by
the beamed non-thermal continuum.
The broad emission-line intensities of BL Lacs are similar to those of
radio-loud quasars (e.g. Pian et al. 2005). The two cases where broad H
is
observed in this study (PKS 0521-365,
erg s-1;
PKS 2201+04,
erg s-1)
confirm this conclusion. It is also consistent with the derived upper limits
in the cases of 1H 0323+022
(
erg s-1), PKS 0548-322
(
erg s-1), and PKS 2005-489
(
erg s-1).
For two BL Lacs (1H 0323+022 and 1ES 1440+122),
we have demonstrated that very nearby (projected distance
8 kpc)
companion galaxies are at the redshift of the BL Lac, indicating that there
is a physical association and a likely interaction. Similar cases have been
found previously for a number of other BL Lacs
(see Pesce et al. 1995; Falomo et al. 2000; Falomo 1996).
Finally, we consider the five BL Lacs that remain featureless in our spectra.
Their redshift lower limits, based on the minimum observable EW of the
non-detected absorption lines, appear consistent with the ones deduced
from imaging. As already noted by S05b, the imaging technique is
more stringent for brighter objects, but the spectral technique is the only
available method for faint (
)
sources.
- Bade, N., Fink,
H. H., & Engels, D. 1994, A&A, 286, 381 [NASA ADS]
- Bressan, A.,
Falomo, R., Valdés, J. R., & Rampazzo, R. 2006, ApJ, 645,
L101 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Carangelo, N., Falomo, R.,
Kotilainen, J., Treves, A., & Ulrich, M.-H. 2003, A&A, 412,
651 [EDP Sciences] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Cardelli,
J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989,
ApJ, 345, 245 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Cheung, C. C.,
Urry, C. M., Scarpa, R., & Giavalisco, M. 2003, ApJ, 599,
155 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Ciprini, S.,
Tosti, G., Teräsranta, H., & Aller, H. D. 2004,
MNRAS, 348, 1379 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Danziger,
I. J., Fosbury, R. A. E., Goss, W. M., &
Ekers, R. D. 1979, MNRAS, 188, 415 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Davis, M. M.
1971, AJ, 76, 980 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Doxsey, R., Bradt,
H., McClintock, J., et al. 1983, ApJ, 264, L43 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Drinkwater,
M. J., Webster, R. L., Francis, P. J., et al. 1997,
MNRAS, 284, 85 [NASA ADS]
- Falomo, R. 1996,
MNRAS, 283, 241 [NASA ADS]
- Falomo, R., &
Kotilainen, J. K. 1999, A&A, 352, 85 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Falomo, R., &
Ulrich, M.-H. 2000, A&A, 357, 91 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Falomo, R.,
Maraschi, L., Treves, A., & Tanzi, E. G. 1987, ApJ, 318,
L39 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Falomo, R., Giraud,
E., Melnick, J., et al. 1991, ApJ, 380, L67 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Falomo, R.,
Bersanelli, M., Bouchet, P., & Tanzi, E. G. 1993, AJ, 106,
11 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Falomo, R., Scarpa,
R., & Bersanelli, M. 1994, ApJS, 93, 125 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Falomo, R., Pesce,
J. E., & Treves, A. 1995, ApJ, 438, L9 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Falomo, R.,
Scarpa, R., Treves, A., & Urry, C. M. 2000, ApJ, 542,
731 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Feigelson,
E. D., Bradt, H., McClintock, J., et al. 1986, ApJ, 302,
337 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Filippenko,
A. V., Djorgovski, S., Spinrad, H., & Sargent,
W. L. W. 1986, AJ, 91, 49 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Fosbury,
R. A. E., & Disney, M. J. 1976, ApJ, 207,
L75 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Gioia, I. M.,
Maccacaro, T., Schild, R. E., et al. 1990, ApJS, 72,
567 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Giommi, P., Piranomonte, S.,
Perri, M., & Padovani, P. 2005, A&A, 434, 385 [EDP Sciences] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Giovannini,
G., Falomo, R., Scarpa, R., Treves, A., & Urry, C. M.
2004, ApJ, 613, 747 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Heidt, J., Nilsson,
K., Sillanpää, A., Takalo, L. O., & Pursimo, T.
1999, A&A, 341, 683 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Heidt, J.,
Tröller, M., Nilsson, K., et al. 2004, A&A, 418,
813 [EDP Sciences] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Hook, I. M.,
Shaver, P. A., Jackson, C. A., Wall, J. V., &
Kellermann, K. I. 2003, A&A, 399, 469 [EDP Sciences] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Horan, D., Badran, H.
M., Bond, I. H., et al. 2004, ApJ, 603, 51 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Horne, K. 1986, PASP,
98, 609 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Kotilainen,
J. K., & Falomo, R. 2004, A&A, 424, 107 [EDP Sciences] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Kotilainen,
J. K., Falomo, R., & Scarpa, R. 1998, A&A, 336,
479 [NASA ADS]
- Kinney, A. L.,
Calzetti, D., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 1996, ApJ, 467,
38 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Landt, H., Padovani,
P., Perlman, E. S., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 323, 757 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Laurent-Muehleisen,
S. A., Kollgaard, R. I., Ciardullo, R., et al. 1998,
ApJS, 118, 127 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Londish, D.,
Croom, S. M., Boyle, B. J., et al. 2002, MNRAS, 334, 941 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Marchã,
M. J. M., Browne, I. W. A., Impey, C. D.,
& Smith, P. S. 1996, MNRAS, 281, 425 [NASA ADS]
- Margon, B., &
Jacoby, G. H. 1984, ApJ, 286, L31 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Nilsson, K.,
Pursimo, T., Heidt, J., et al. 2003, A&A, 400, 95 [EDP Sciences] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Oke, J. B. 1990, AJ,
99, 1621 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Owen, F. N., &
Muffson, S. L. 1977, AJ, 82, 776 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Padovani, P.,
& Giommi, P. 1995a, MNRAS, 277, 1477 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Pian, E., Falomo, R.,
Ghisellini, G., et al. 1996, ApJ, 459, 169 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Pian, E., Falomo, R.,
& Treves, A. 2005, MNRAS, 361, 919 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Penton, S. V.,
Stocke, J. T., & Shull, J. M. 2004, ApJS, 152,
29 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Perlman,
E. S., Stocke, J. T., Schachter, J. F., et al. 1996,
ApJS, 104, 251 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Pesce, J. E.,
Falomo, R., & Treves, A. 1994, AJ, 107, 494 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Pesce, J. E.,
Falomo, R., & Treves, A. 1995, AJ, 110, 1554 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Pesce, J. E.,
Urry, C. M., Maraschi, L., et al. 1997, ApJ, 486, 770 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Rector, T. A.,
& Stocke, J. T. 2001, AJ, 122, 565 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Richards,
G. T., Fan, X., Newberg, H. J., et al. 2002, AJ, 123,
2945 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Sbarufatti, B., Treves, A.,
Falomo, R., et al. 2005a, AJ, 129, 599 (S05a)
- Sbarufatti, B., Treves, A.,
& Falomo, R. 2005b, ApJ, 635, 173 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (S05b)
- Sbarufatti, B., Treves, A.,
Falomo, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 1 [NASA ADS] (S06)
- Scarpa, R., Falomo,
R., & Pian, E. 1995, A&A, 303, 730 [NASA ADS]
- Scarpa, R., Urry,
C. M., Falomo, R., & Treves, A. 1999, ApJ, 526, 643 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Scarpa, R., Urry,
C. M., Falomo, R., Pesce, J. E., & Treves, A. 2000,
ApJ, 532, 740 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Schachter,
J. F., Stocke, J. T., Perlman, E., et al. 1993, ApJ, 412,
541 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Schlegel,
D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500,
525 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Sowards-Emmerd,
D., Romani, R. W., Michelson, P. F., Healey, S. E.,
& Nolan, P. L. 2005, ApJ, 626, 95 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Stecker,
F. W., de Jager, O. C., & Salamon, M. H. 1996,
ApJ, 473, L75 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Stickel, M.,
& Kühr, H. 1993, A&AS, 100, 395 [NASA ADS]
- Stocke, J. T.,
Liebert, J., Schmidt, G., et al. 1985, ApJ, 298, 619 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Tody, D. 1986,
Proc. SPIE, 627, 733 [NASA ADS]
- Tody, D. 1993,
Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems II, 2, ASP
Conf. Ser., 52, 173
- Urry, C. M.,
Scarpa, R., O'Dowd, M., et al. 2000, ApJ, 532, 816 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Véron-Cetty,
M.-P., & Véron, P. 1993, A&AS, 100, 521 [NASA ADS]
- Villata, M.,
Raiteri, C. M., Popescu, M. D., et al. 2000,
A&AS, 144, 481 [EDP Sciences] [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Weiler, K. W.,
& Johnston, K. J. 1980, MNRAS, 190, 269 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- White, R. L.,
Becker, R. H., Gregg, M. D., et al. 2000, ApJS, 126, 133 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Wills, D., &
Wills, B. J. 1976, ApJS, 31, 143 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Wills, B. J.,
& Wills, D. 1979, ApJS, 41, 689 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Woo, J.-H., Urry,
M. C., van der Marel, R. P., Lira, P., & Maza, J.
2005, ApJ, 631, 762 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Wright, S. C.,
McHardy, I. M., Abraham, R. G., & Crawford,
C. S. 1998, MNRAS, 296, 961 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Wurtz, R., Stocke,
J. T., & Yee, H. K. C. 1996, ApJS, 103, 109 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
Copyright ESO 2006