DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200810097
Interpreting the yield of transit surveys: are there groups in the known transiting planets population?
F. Fressin1, T. Guillot1, and L. Nesta21 Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur, Laboratoire Cassiopée, CNRS UMR 6202, BP 4229, 06304 Nice cedex 4, France
e-mail: ffressin@cfa.harvard.edu
2 Observatoire Français des Conjonctures Économiques (OFCE), 250 rue Albert Einstein, 06560 Valbonne, France
Received 30 April 2008 / Accepted 24 December 2008
Abstract
Context. Each transiting planet discovered is characterized by 7
measurable quantities, that may or may not be linked. This
includes those relative to the planet (mass, radius, orbital period, and
equilibrium temperature) and those relative to the star (mass, radius,
effective temperature, and metallicity). Correlations between planet
mass and period, surface gravity and period, planet radius and star
temperature have been previously observed among the 31 known transiting
giant planets. Two classes of planets have been previously identified based on their
Safronov number.
Aims. We use the CoRoTlux transit surveys to compare simulated events to
the sample of discovered planets and test the statistical
significance of these correlations. Using a model proved to be able to
match the yield of OGLE transit survey, we generate a large sample of
simulated detections, in which we can statistically test the different
trends observed in the small sample of known transiting planets.
Methods. We first generate a stellar field with planetary companions based on
radial velocity discoveries, use a planetary evolution model
assuming a variable fraction of heavy elements to compute the
characteristics of transit events, then apply a detection
criterion that includes both statistical and red noise
sources. We compare the yield of our simulated survey
with the ensemble of 31 well-characterized giant transiting
planets, using different statistical tools, including a multivariate
logistic analysis to assess whether the simulated distribution
matches the known transiting planets.
Results. Our results satisfactorily match the distribution of known transiting
planet characteristics. Our multivariate analysis shows that our simulated
sample and observations are consistent to 76%. The mass vs. period correlation for giant
planets first observed with radial velocity holds with transiting
planets. The correlation between surface gravity and period can be
explained as the combined effect of the mass vs. period lower limit
and by the decreasing transit probability and detection efficiency
for longer periods and higher surface gravity. Our model also
naturally explains other trends, like the correlation between
planetary radius and stellar effective temperature. Finally, we are
also able to reproduce the previously observed apparent bimodal
distribution of planetary Safronov numbers in 10% of our simulated
cases, although our model predicts a continuous
distribution. This shows that the evidence for the existence of two
groups of planets with different intrinsic properties is not
statistically significant.
Key words: methods: statistical -- techniques: photometric -- planets and satellites: formation -- planetary systems -- planetary systems: formation
© ESO 2009

BibSonomy
CiteUlike
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Twitter